orange_barnet wrote:dramtastic wrote:Well I haven't seen them like that but there's still plenty of time...
Please don't think I was egging you on to go and find some....
No, in this case the chicken came first........
orange_barnet wrote:dramtastic wrote:Well I haven't seen them like that but there's still plenty of time...
Please don't think I was egging you on to go and find some....
Willie JJ wrote:C57 wrote:Last week I popped into TWE just to see.
Always a bad idea. I came out with:
Tomintoul 21
Springbank Rundlets & Kilderkins
Inchgower 14yo F&F
Tomintoul 21 - Hmm
Springbank Rundlets & Kilderkins - Yum
Inchgower 14yo F&F - If you like Inchgower then this is good stuff
IMO of course

C57 wrote:Willie JJ wrote:C57 wrote:Last week I popped into TWE just to see.
Always a bad idea. I came out with:
Tomintoul 21
Springbank Rundlets & Kilderkins
Inchgower 14yo F&F
Tomintoul 21 - Hmm
Springbank Rundlets & Kilderkins - Yum
Inchgower 14yo F&F - If you like Inchgower then this is good stuff
IMO of course
I do like Inchgower. I like Springer a lot, as you know.
Tomintoul - just an experiment. Many years since I had one as far as I can recall, and that was 10 or 12. IIRC it was thin and spirity and rather metallic. I just thought I'd see what may have changed over the years.
|If we're talking JM, he rated the 21yo 93.5 ! We'll seeWillie JJ wrote:Tomintoul is light for sure, but the current range is generally pleasant. I particularly like the 12yo Oloroso finish and the peaty tang, both of which are great value imo, and the 14yo is nice, although its not the same one that JM raved about. I just thought that the casks that went into the the 21yo were a bit woody and bitter. I'll be interested to see what you think.

scotchio wrote:had to order the glen spey in the end. Thats definitely it for this year tho
robjohnston wrote:scotchio wrote:had to order the glen spey in the end. Thats definitely it for this year tho
you mean month?......
cato wrote:Glen Elgin 25 yo, dist: 1980, bot: 2005, 44.1%, Scott's Selection
Exciseman wrote:"Glenmorangie Lasanta" from my darling daughter. We cracked it open last night and both Sue and I enjoyed it. Stunned to read in the Bible that (after a re-tasting) JM gave it only 68/100. The "sulphur" thing again.
JM can only report what HE gets from a whisky and I truly respect him for that. However, it is a shame that his notes may put many off trying "Lasanta"
solera wrote:Arran Eagle x 2
DavidUK wrote:Exciseman wrote:"Glenmorangie Lasanta" from my darling daughter. We cracked it open last night and both Sue and I enjoyed it. Stunned to read in the Bible that (after a re-tasting) JM gave it only 68/100. The "sulphur" thing again.
JM can only report what HE gets from a whisky and I truly respect him for that. However, it is a shame that his notes may put many off trying "Lasanta"
Ah!! It makes sense now why so many whisky drinkers slate the Lasanta. I wasn't aware that Murray had marked it so low. I finished a bottle last year and thoroughly enjoyed it.
Exciseman wrote:JM can only report what HE gets from a whisky and I truly respect him for that. However, it is a shame that his notes may put many off trying "Lasanta"
scotchio wrote:.I'm at the point where I wouldnt by another GM Mortlach 15 cos the last two are badly sulphured. Doesnt mean GM Mortlach 15 is rubbish just not worth risking again. I'll be very careful indeed before picking up another Mortlach.
Users browsing this forum: Pudge72 and 3 guests