portwood wrote:Any idea if the price of the 40% is lower than the previous 46%?
Very slightly cheaper, a bit of an overlap. Checking whiskybase, it seems that the 46% is a 2006 bottling and it's been 40% ever since.
portwood wrote:Any idea if the price of the 40% is lower than the previous 46%?
portwood wrote:mongo wrote:i know, i know. i don't believe in ratings myself, and yet i constantly succumb to their pressure.
in this particular instance (and some others) it's the consistent rating given by multiple reviewers that gives me pause. there are some bottles which get scores in the 72-90 range from the maniacs and end up with a low-80s average--this is not one of them.
The rating isn't as consistent as you suggest- even for this one.
Pete Smoke wrote:Very slightly cheaper, a bit of an overlap. Checking whiskybase, it seems that the 46% is a 2006 bottling and it's been 40% ever since.
two-bit cowboy wrote:There seems to be this theory that every peated whisky must mirror the kids from Islay. Too bad, really. Many peated, non-Islay's are terrific.
two-bit cowboy wrote:Pete Smoke wrote:Very slightly cheaper, a bit of an overlap. Checking whiskybase, it seems that the 46% is a 2006 bottling and it's been 40% ever since.
I recently bought a case of Curiositas for the saloon (USA); still 46% and the same price as 2008.
portwood wrote:Good point. I now regret using the Islay reference.
I'm new to this. Lesson learned.
mongo wrote:i know this is very weak-minded of me, but frankly, the lukewarm scores the malt maniacs, and serge in particular, give to this line as a whole (the younger, affordable ones anyway) have always stopped me from indulging my own curiositas. that and the stupid names.
JethroTull wrote:mongo wrote:i know this is very weak-minded of me, but frankly, the lukewarm scores the malt maniacs, and serge in particular, give to this line as a whole (the younger, affordable ones anyway) have always stopped me from indulging my own curiositas. that and the stupid names.
The young Benriachs are usually excellent.
The 10 and the 21 are the most Islay-like of the peated speysiders available. The 12 is good but the 16 is the most representative of the non-peated range.
For a treat, get yourself a miniatures pack and taste the 12, 16 and 20 year old back to back. They look identical to the naked eye but the tastes are a quantum leap apart.

les taylor wrote:There are two new expressions coming.
http://www.royalmilewhiskies.com/produc ... 0000001296
BENRIACH 12 Year Old Horizons
Distillery: Benriach
Horizons is Benriach's latest experiment in whisky by elevating their malt to the painfully small range of triple distilled Scottish whisky. In addition to this it is set to be very rich in nose and palate with a minimum finishing time of three years in Oloroso sherry butts!
http://www.royalmilewhiskies.com/produc ... 0000001297
BENRIACH 15 Year Old Solstice
Distillery: Benriach
This limited edition bottling of Benriach is not only a 15 year old tawny port at cask strength but is heavily peated and triple distilled! Since the casks used in this are the best that the distillery manager and the master blender have found in the warehouse this looks set to be fantastic!
Evidently my sources say they are very good.
jwise wrote:I am a bit of a traditionalist, and would prefer to see distilleries producing whisky in their own regional traditions. I understand that each distillery is just trying to capture as much market share as possible, but it is destroying the relevance of whisky regions. However, I also like variety. I don't mind it when distilleries experiment with various finishes, but leave the distillation/malting processes alone.
I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who enjoy the peated highland whiskies, and don't care at all about traditional whisky making.
Just my thoughts...

Peat Sampras wrote:I think I only have tasted peated BenRiachs so far and it is not my cuppa. Like others, I have yet to find a peated Speysider to please my palate. Never say never though. However, BenRiach is one of the most beautiful distilleries I have ever seen, situated in the heart of Speyside. Lovely.
C57 wrote:jwise wrote:I am a bit of a traditionalist, and would prefer to see distilleries producing whisky in their own regional traditions. I understand that each distillery is just trying to capture as much market share as possible, but it is destroying the relevance of whisky regions. However, I also like variety. I don't mind it when distilleries experiment with various finishes, but leave the distillation/malting processes alone.
I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who enjoy the peated highland whiskies, and don't care at all about traditional whisky making.
Just my thoughts...
Peated highland malts are traditional.
scotchio wrote:Aye but they didn't generally triple distill.Or did they ? If you go back far enough weren't most triple distilling
karlejnar wrote:Re: BenRiach peated, triple distilled, port matured etc.
I think we should look at these "experiments" from a different perspective. First of all it's not the same as Bruichladdich does, since they do all these experiments on new distilations done after they took over the distillery.
Secondly these are casks laid down by the previous owner - Chivas Brothers (Pernod Ricard) most likely for use in their blends. A number of their distilleries did peated batches now and again, to secure casks for blending without having to buy these from Islay distilleries. That's the main reason why we now see peated Benriach, Caperdonich and maybe others. The new owners of BenRiach are now bottling these casks as single malts.
C57 wrote:And I'd far rather they didn't "finish", most of the time. Though there are exceptions, like the original Glenmo Port Wood

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests