bpbleus wrote: Anyone knows what went in this one in the 60ies and 70ies?
whiskytime wrote:... This proves - don't judge a whiskey on first sniff/taste. Some take longer to open. I probably would not have put this on my replace-when-finished list after the first try but now I will replace; it's really good & reasonably priced ($35 USD).
Pudge72 wrote:whiskytime wrote:... This proves - don't judge a whiskey on first sniff/taste. Some take longer to open. I probably would not have put this on my replace-when-finished list after the first try but now I will replace; it's really good & reasonably priced ($35 USD).
I have noticed myself, and read in reviews, that this phenomenon seems to be more prevalent and more dramatic with bourbons and ryes, compared to Scotch. One example I had read about, IIRC, was an Elijah Craig 12 that had a distracting soapy note upon opening the bottle. 18 months later, that note had disappeared and dramatically altered the overall impression of the bottle.
athlete cured wrote:bpbleus wrote: Anyone knows what went in this one in the 60ies and 70ies?
I tried to figure out what might be in it now, but all I could find was that Convalmore and Glentauchers were main components at some point in the past.
whiskytime wrote:JW Dant Bourbon BIB - 50% ABVThen on to a small dram of High West Double Rye - 46% ABV - no CF - This one has greatly improved since initial opening of the bottle; the bottle is less than a 1/4 down. Less dill (just a hint now), less alcohol blast, more vanilla, rye spice, nutmeg & cinnamon - delicious. This proves - don't judge a whiskey on first sniff/taste. Some take longer to open. I probably would not have put this on my replace-when-finished list after the first try but now I will replace; it's really good & reasonably priced ($35 USD).
John Barleycorn wrote:Went to the SMWS tastings evening in Inverness last night with Mrs B. Mine host, Olaf Meier, had brought up a selection of five malts from next month’s ‘First Friday’ bottling’s from Edinburgh.
We started off with a 125.60 ‘Expanding universe of flavour’ a Glenmorangie 10yo 60.8%ABV ex-bourbon hogshead refill a very palatable dram and even more so with a wee drop of water added, a very characteristic bottling of Glenmorangie from the society. A sweetness on both the nose and the palate with notes of vanilla, fruit cake and a few more which Mrs B was able to detect but which somehow past me by.
The next offering was a Longmorn 7.72 ‘Buxom and comforting’, to drew any similarity between the title of this bottling and my companion for the evening would I think land me in a spot of trouble, only to say that like Mrs B this was a 21yo. This dram had an ABV of 52.9% and was a refill ex-bourbon barrel. A light sweet dram, the sweetness was not as intense in comparison to the Glenmo, with notes of vanilla, chocolate and lemon. In my opinion this was far the best offering of the evening.
We then moved on to a 9yo Arran 121.50 ‘Xmas cake and Afghan coats’ a sherry butt refill with a 61.3%ABV. Got the Xmas cake part with hints of liquorice, as for the Afghan coat I can only say that there are probable too many old hippies on the tasting panel in Queen Street. Not a dram which I warmed too, I did detect a slight hint of sulphur.
The penultimate offering was a Glen Scotia 93.52 ‘Wench with a wrench’. A smoky 9yo dram with an AVB of 58.4% this was a refill bourbon barrel. There was vanilla on the nose and a syrupy sweetness with hints of pear on the pallet. No comparison what so ever can be made towards my good lady on this one, I don’t think she knows what a wrench is for.
The final dram of the night was a Caol Ila 53.161 ‘Manuka honey and Rooibos red tea’. This 10yo had a 57.6%ABV and was from a refill bourbon hogshead. A smoky peaty dram with a hint of TCP on the nose but it was not over powering and a lemony zest on the pallet. I don’t know how the panel come up with the titles for their bottlings, Rooibos red tea! I’ve never seen that on the shelves in Tesco’s
Cheers John
cato wrote: log finish --
dramtastic wrote:cato wrote: log finish --
Sounds overly woody......
Willie JJ wrote:Thanks for that Steffen, its really useful info. I really like those old Kawasakis too.
dramtastic wrote:The '82 for Whisky Live Japan 2011 which you may have a sample of, is quite a bit better than the '81 IMO....
Willie JJ wrote:dramtastic wrote:The '82 for Whisky Live Japan 2011 which you may have a sample of, is quite a bit better than the '81 IMO....
I'll be investigating that shortly
jsaliga wrote:whiskytime wrote:JW Dant Bourbon BIB - 50% ABVThen on to a small dram of High West Double Rye - 46% ABV - no CF - This one has greatly improved since initial opening of the bottle; the bottle is less than a 1/4 down. Less dill (just a hint now), less alcohol blast, more vanilla, rye spice, nutmeg & cinnamon - delicious. This proves - don't judge a whiskey on first sniff/taste. Some take longer to open. I probably would not have put this on my replace-when-finished list after the first try but now I will replace; it's really good & reasonably priced ($35 USD).
I have a bottle of the High West Rendezvous Rye. The first dram really put me off. Dill weed dominates the nose and did this rye in for me. I hope this whisky improves as I work my way through the bottle, but at the moment I remain unimpressed. I found nosing the Rendezvous Rye to be very similar to Bulleit Rye, the former is a blend with some 16 yr old rye in it and it shows on the palate. Both are made by LDI. High West is also distilling its own spirit, but that is still aging in barrels and will not be ready for a few more years.
--Jerome
Users browsing this forum: athlete cured and 4 guests