Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray view

General Whisky and Whiskey Chat.

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Exciseman » 11 Apr 2012, 11:52

My personal view is that the 'whisky regions' are dinosaurs.

I find shops (whether bricks-and-mortar or online) that groups malts in this way really annoying, especially where they additionally categorise by sub-regions.

What's wrong with a straight A-Z?
Exciseman
 
Posts: 1619
Joined: 14 Nov 2008, 22:36
Location: North of London, South of Edinburgh
Title: Drinker, collector and investor
Favourite Whiskies: Anything sherried
No. of Bottles: 0

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Nick Brown » 11 Apr 2012, 14:00

kallaskander wrote:Hi there,

whisky regions made sense - in times gone by. It was eons ago that whisky was considered a local product and the region where it was made was important...
Who cares for regions anyway? And why?

Greetings
kallaskander

so you would presumably have no objection if, say, peated Benriachs were sold as Islay malts or Glenkinchies as Highland malts
ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Nick Brown
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 01:16
Location: Melbourne
Title: Mr Pink
No. of Bottles: 0

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby scotchio » 11 Apr 2012, 14:40

The smarter shops have both plus a search function so how is it a problem? If you classify by flavour some distilleries will crop up all over the place, like benriach. And where do you draw the line in caregorizing by flavour when each cask is in itself a variant.
scotchio
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 10:48
Location: Devon UK
Title: I'm still thinking of a title...
No. of Bottles: 100

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Lawrence » 11 Apr 2012, 15:56

We can fix that Mr. T.

If regions don't matter then Scotland doesn't matter as a region. Put Lagavulin on a barge and set up shop in Guangzhou where there's cheaper labour.
User avatar
Lawrence
 
Posts: 1365
Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 03:34
No. of Bottles: 0

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby mongo » 11 Apr 2012, 16:51

remarking the (demonstrable) fact that there is rarely a consistency of style within regions surely is not tantamount to saying that regional information should be dispensed with completely or played fast and loose with.
my annoying opinions: my blog (mostly whisky reviews)
User avatar
mongo
 
Posts: 4002
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 22:38
Location: ultima thule
Title: pawn in game of life
Favourite Whiskies: various peated and unpeated whiskies from ex-sherry and ex-bourbon casks.
No. of Bottles: 217
Twitter: WhiskyOpinions

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby olikli » 11 Apr 2012, 17:09

I'm not really sure if the climate in Guangzhou is comparable to Scotland. And cheap labour is hardly a factor for making whisky. How many people work in an average distillery? 5? 10?

Hmmm. You might consider replacing the expensive marketing and PR people with cheap Chinese working bees. Could actually be refreshing given what we are currently being served ;)
http://www.dramming.com - Everything Whisky
User avatar
olikli
 
Posts: 995
Joined: 29 Jul 2009, 16:11
Location: Munich Rubble Plain
Title: Dramming along
Favourite Whiskies: All but Loch Dhu and Rothaus Black Forest Whisky
No. of Bottles: 0
Twitter: OliverKlimek
Facebook: Oliver Klimek

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Exciseman » 11 Apr 2012, 17:51

You can't, of course, classify distilleries by 'flavour category'. What you can do though is classify individual expressions by category. There are shops that do just that with wine.
Exciseman
 
Posts: 1619
Joined: 14 Nov 2008, 22:36
Location: North of London, South of Edinburgh
Title: Drinker, collector and investor
Favourite Whiskies: Anything sherried
No. of Bottles: 0

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby William » 11 Apr 2012, 19:24

bpbleus wrote:I use two categories to classify Scotch whisky: those that are made in Scotland and those that are not.


Am I the only person baffled by your comment? :?
William
 
Posts: 109
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 20:02

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby William » 11 Apr 2012, 19:36

Lawrence wrote:We can fix that Mr. T.

If regions don't matter then Scotland doesn't matter as a region. Put Lagavulin on a barge and set up shop in Guangzhou where there's cheaper labour.


ok, but then it couldn't be called Scotch.

Scotland is not a region - unless you want to classify Canada, Australia, Ireland, North America etc as "regions" of the old British Empire (I do hope you don't!)

Ipso dipsomaniac ( I made that up) you can't move Lagavulin Distllery on a (hufge?) barge and take it to China and call its whisky Scotch.

But you could make a Lagavulin-style Scotch at Benriach and call it Benriach.

Am I taking this too seriously? ;)
William
 
Posts: 109
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 20:02

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Peat Sampras » 11 Apr 2012, 20:53

I am, like Mr Tattie Heid, a map nerd and geography amateur and therefore, I like the regions concept. I even have whisky maps representing the 4 regions (Lowland, Highland (including Campbeltown), Speyside and Islay). I do not recognise the Islands as a region though :D And I do like threads like "is Dalwhinnie a Speyside distillery" :D 8-)
Image

Caramel is the Devil
User avatar
Peat Sampras
 
Posts: 3155
Joined: 18 Sep 2009, 17:23
Title: John D'oh
Favourite Whiskies: Bourbon cask matured cask strength single cask scotch whiskies
No. of Bottles: 0

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Lawrence » 12 Apr 2012, 00:14

William wrote:
Lawrence wrote:We can fix that Mr. T.

If regions don't matter then Scotland doesn't matter as a region. Put Lagavulin on a barge and set up shop in Guangzhou where there's cheaper labour.


ok, but then it couldn't be called Scotch.

Scotland is not a region - unless you want to classify Canada, Australia, Ireland, North America etc as "regions" of the old British Empire (I do hope you don't!)

Ipso dipsomaniac ( I made that up) you can't move Lagavulin Distllery on a (hufge?) barge and take it to China and call its whisky Scotch.

But you could make a Lagavulin-style Scotch at Benriach and call it Benriach.

Am I taking this too seriously? ;)


Yes, you are missing the point and everybdody here is aware of the SW regulations.
User avatar
Lawrence
 
Posts: 1365
Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 03:34
No. of Bottles: 0

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Pete Smoke » 12 Apr 2012, 00:24

Peat Sampras wrote: I do not recognise the Islands as a region though




Have you enforced a trade embargo, and withdrawn diplomatic relations?
I've spent a lot of money on whisky and women, the rest i squandered
User avatar
Pete Smoke
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: 26 Jan 2010, 14:15
Location: Here with complete metaphysical certitude
Title: the heretic
Favourite Whiskies: All whiskies that are free of e150a
No. of Bottles: 1

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Mr Tattie Heid » 12 Apr 2012, 04:23

Nick Brown wrote:
kallaskander wrote:Hi there,

whisky regions made sense - in times gone by. It was eons ago that whisky was considered a local product and the region where it was made was important...
Who cares for regions anyway? And why?

Greetings
kallaskander

so you would presumably have no objection if, say, peated Benriachs were sold as Islay malts or Glenkinchies as Highland malts

Why would he see validity in bogus regions when he doesn't see validity in actual ones?
Image
www.mrtattieheid.com ~ Travel Journals & Photographs
User avatar
Mr Tattie Heid
 
Posts: 6973
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 00:32
Location: The Midden Heap, Bog of Allen, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
Title: Finnish Soap Dish Wholesale Vendor
Favourite Whiskies: Thomson & Porteus Celebrated Half-Dark Nailrod
No. of Bottles: 90

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby kallaskander » 12 Apr 2012, 08:42

Hi there,

Mr Tattie Heid wrote:
Nick Brown wrote:
kallaskander wrote:Hi there,

whisky regions made sense - in times gone by. It was eons ago that whisky was considered a local product and the region where it was made was important...
Who cares for regions anyway? And why?

Greetings
kallaskander

so you would presumably have no objection if, say, peated Benriachs were sold as Islay malts or Glenkinchies as Highland malts

Why would he see validity in bogus regions when he doesn't see validity in actual ones?


I see the finer points of irony were lost in translation.

And the question if I would object to a peated Benriach being sold as an Islay malt is a case in point.

I do think that regions are pretty useless in a world where the compouds of a malt have very little to do with the region where the malt is cobbled together.

But I am all for regions and do not want to see them vanish.

Indeed it would be a loss of information if you would classify an Ardbeg and a peated Benriach only as "peaty malts".
The naming of the regions Islay and Speyside is the important information and distinction between the two because Islay peat and peat used for Benriach might differ.
And if you used Islay peat to make Benriach - how would you be able to tell them apart in a system based on flavours alone?
The same the other way round. The information that unpeated Bunnahabhain Bruichladdich and Caol Ila Highland style are not Speysiders is important.

It might be convenient for interested parties to have a wishi washi conglomerate of peated whisky - a category which would include the usual Islay suspects the Benriach peated line Ledaig and Highland Park the peated Loch Lomonds Ardmore Benromach 10 Ballantruan by the Tomintoul distillery peated Isle of Jura Caoran Reserve Fiddich the odd Islay cask finish peated Balvenie Brora but not Clynelish and all other odd peated experiments by distilleries I just do not remember at the moment.

Where is the gain in that?

Greetings
kallaskander
Never water another man's whisky.
kallaskander
 
Posts: 819
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 10:02

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby DavidUK » 12 Apr 2012, 19:37

[/quote]
so you would presumably have no objection if, say, peated Benriachs were sold as Islay malts or Glenkinchies as Highland malts[/quote]
Why would he see validity in bogus regions when he doesn't see validity in actual ones?[/quote]



It might be convenient for interested parties to have a wishi washi conglomerate of peated whisky - a category which would include the usual Islay suspects the Benriach peated line Ledaig and Highland Park the peated Loch Lomonds Ardmore Benromach 10 Ballantruan by the Tomintoul distillery peated Isle of Jura Caoran Reserve Fiddich the odd Islay cask finish peated Balvenie Brora but not Clynelish and all other odd peated experiments by distilleries I just do not remember at the moment.

Where is the gain in that?

Greetings
kallaskander[/quote]


None whatsoever!!
DavidUK
 
Posts: 738
Joined: 02 Apr 2010, 20:35
Location: Essex
Title: Whisky Anorak
Favourite Whiskies: Glendronach Single Casks, Bladnoch,Springbank,Lochside,Balbair
No. of Bottles: 150

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby William » 13 Apr 2012, 17:58

Lawrence wrote:
Yes, you are missing the point



Mr T's point was that "geography is geography, and whisky is whisky. It's too easy for novices to confuse the two." Which I take to mean that if a whisky tastes like Lagavulin, then it tastes like Lagavulin, no matter where it is located.

I was merely questioning (ineffectively, obviously) the relevance of that slow boat to China you mentioned.
William
 
Posts: 109
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 20:02

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Willie JJ » 14 Apr 2012, 00:56

kallaskander wrote:But I am all for regions and do not want to see them vanish.

Indeed it would be a loss of information if you would classify an Ardbeg and a peated Benriach only as "peaty malts".
The naming of the regions Islay and Speyside is the important information and distinction between the two because Islay peat and peat used for Benriach might differ.
And if you used Islay peat to make Benriach - how would you be able to tell them apart in a system based on flavours alone?
The same the other way round. The information that unpeated Bunnahabhain Bruichladdich and Caol Ila Highland style are not Speysiders is important.

But doesn't the real information come from the distillery name? Knowing the distillery provides the geographical info and more. People need to know a fair bit to understand your peating point and those same folk will not be fooled by regional classifications. The classifications are only for the marketers I think.
Willie

It is better to have drunk it all than never to have drunk at all.
Image
User avatar
Willie JJ
 
Posts: 3875
Joined: 15 Nov 2008, 22:51
Location: nr. Edinburgh
Title: You don't like it? You're just not trying.
Favourite Whiskies: I like those whiskies with an alcohol content of 40% and above.
No. of Bottles: 0

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Mr Tattie Heid » 14 Apr 2012, 01:15

I don't have any problem with sorting distilleries by region. As I said, it's a matter of geography. What I object to is putting too much credence in regional style. It's something we see relative novices do: "I'm conducting a tasting, and want to include typical samples from each region. What do you suggest?" We invariably advise them to forget about regions and concentrate on a variety of flavor profiles. It's true you'll almost always end up with one of the Kildalton malts, and it's hard to argue that south shore Islay isn't an interesting subregion in itself. But if you walked into Gordon & MacPhail knowing nothing but regions, you might pick Bruichladdich for your Islay, Bladnoch for your Lowland, Aberfeldy as a Highlander, An Cnoc as a Speyside. If you did this after attending a tasting with carefully chosen representative samples form each region, I think you'd end up being very confused.
Image
www.mrtattieheid.com ~ Travel Journals & Photographs
User avatar
Mr Tattie Heid
 
Posts: 6973
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 00:32
Location: The Midden Heap, Bog of Allen, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
Title: Finnish Soap Dish Wholesale Vendor
Favourite Whiskies: Thomson & Porteus Celebrated Half-Dark Nailrod
No. of Bottles: 90

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby two-bit cowboy » 14 Apr 2012, 14:34

Here's a great post that supports neither one side of the argument nor the other, but rather offers a well-regarded opinion as a guideline. Plus, it's a good read.

http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/2012/ ... conundrum/
Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago.
Bernard Berenson
User avatar
two-bit cowboy
 
Posts: 1146
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 15:18
Location: a skosh left of right
Title: dramatis personae
Favourite Whiskies: Q. alba
No. of Bottles: 86

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby mongo » 14 Apr 2012, 16:28

being able to appreciate the (often great) diversity of styles and profiles within regions is no less worthy a reason to maintain regional identification than the fiction that knowing the region necessarily tells you something about all the whisky produced in it.
my annoying opinions: my blog (mostly whisky reviews)
User avatar
mongo
 
Posts: 4002
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 22:38
Location: ultima thule
Title: pawn in game of life
Favourite Whiskies: various peated and unpeated whiskies from ex-sherry and ex-bourbon casks.
No. of Bottles: 217
Twitter: WhiskyOpinions

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby Peat Sampras » 14 Apr 2012, 17:52

Pete Smoke wrote:
Peat Sampras wrote: I do not recognise the Islands as a region though




Have you enforced a trade embargo, and withdrawn diplomatic relations?


Indeed it seems that this year I will visit no Scottish Island, other than the three previous years. However, this is due to me trying to save some money. I would love to go to the Islands this year and I will surely be back sometimes. So no embargo here :)
Image

Caramel is the Devil
User avatar
Peat Sampras
 
Posts: 3155
Joined: 18 Sep 2009, 17:23
Title: John D'oh
Favourite Whiskies: Bourbon cask matured cask strength single cask scotch whiskies
No. of Bottles: 0

Re: Classifying Scotch whisky by region - the Jim Murray vie

Postby scotchio » 14 Apr 2012, 23:45

Mr Tattie Heid wrote:I don't have any problem with sorting distilleries by region. As I said, it's a matter of geography. What I object to is putting too much credence in regional style. It's something we see relative novices do: "I'm conducting a tasting, and want to include typical samples from each region. What do you suggest?" We invariably advise them to forget about regions and concentrate on a variety of flavor profiles. It's true you'll almost always end up with one of the Kildalton malts, and it's hard to argue that south shore Islay isn't an interesting subregion in itself. But if you walked into Gordon & MacPhail knowing nothing but regions, you might pick Bruichladdich for your Islay, Bladnoch for your Lowland, Aberfeldy as a Highlander, An Cnoc as a Speyside. If you did this after attending a tasting with carefully chosen representative samples form each region, I think you'd end up being very confused.


But there are general common styles in certain areas.
Lowland: malty light grassy lemony,unpeated
Islay Peaty
Midlands/east some creamy small still malts others often notably fruity
North East Highlands Light and spicy
Traditional Highlands big bodied and smoky
Cambeltown Briny
Speyside Bigger full bodied malts with a tradition of sherry maturation are concentrated in central Speyside,Southern speyside on the Livet has a number of delicate light malts,some ofthe distilleries in Keith and Rothes have similar qualities.
Course these are generalizations and there are exceptions but it doesnt make the idea irrelevant

Good old Michael Jackson liked his regions and prattled on about breathing casks,peaty water,peat structure,rock forms.lepricorns etc.Wonderfully fanciful and maybe complete nonsense but there is some sense in the idea that factories in a common area may choose to create a similar style of product.Geography and tradition are a big part of the image of whiskies.Take the location out of the equation and you're discussing nondescript factories producing a range of flavoured spirit drinks.
scotchio
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 10:48
Location: Devon UK
Title: I'm still thinking of a title...
No. of Bottles: 100

Previous

Return to Whisky Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yello to Mello and 1 guest

cron