Malt-Teaser wrote:Would you like to expand upon what you see as "real whisky" as opposed to what the SWA defines as "(real) whisky"?

C57 wrote:When I said Campaign for Real Whisky, it read to me as CReW.
Yep, non CF and no E150.
That doesn't mean not allowing CF and Colour, just, as Mark says, labelling it properly.
Mark C wrote:I would also like to campaign for any coloured whisky to be labelled as such, like the German law. In fact I would like all whiskies to be labelled as either coloured or chill-filtered. The only producers doing so are the ones who are stating that they do not do these. It should work both ways instead of being a guessing game.
Mark C wrote:C57 wrote:When I said Campaign for Real Whisky, it read to me as CReW.
Yep, non CF and no E150.
That doesn't mean not allowing CF and Colour, just, as Mark says, labelling it properly.
But also increasing awareness with consumers and encouraging producers to think about stopping both of these practices?


Malt-Teaser wrote:Meanwhile, how about moving this discussion to clubs & Societies as I think it would fit better there long-term.
Leither wrote:BTW, I'd say Ralfy for Honorary President
Anster wrote:I like CRAW because in Scots it means to call or boast and producers who are not chill-filtering or carmeling certainly have something to craw about.
Leither wrote:Anster wrote:I like CRAW because in Scots it means to call or boast and producers who are not chill-filtering or carmeling certainly have something to craw about.
Cheers, I forgot to explain that bit, I just assumed folk would know what the Scots 'craw' meant.
Return to The Campaign for Real Whisky
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests